[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 3662] HD 95687 - It deserves GCVS status.
- Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2000 17:09:45 -0300
- To: <vsnet-newvar@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>, "observations account" <observations@aavso.org>, "AAVSO DISCUSSION" <aavso-discussion@informer2.cis.McMaster.CA>
- From: Sebasti若n Otero <varsao@fullzero.com.ar>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 3662] HD 95687 - It deserves GCVS status.
- Cc: <vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Dear friends:
Another very bright and interesting variable. It's very strange that this star
hasn't been noted as variable before.
I'm refering to HD 95687 in Carina. It's one of the new Tycho variables
announced by Woitas (IBVS 4444, 1997) The list presented there shows a very
strange 2.91 day period for a supergiant M2Iab red variable (not surprisingly,
since most of the periods found with Hipparcos & Tycho are like
that).
This is another very red star (B-V= 2.1). And its variability could have been
found from ground measurements long ago:
We can find this values:
V= 7.38, B-V= 2.06 ( Humphreys, Strecker and Ney, 1972)
V= 7.35, B-V= 2.12 ( Humphreys, 1978)
V= 7.19, B-V= 2.06 (Tycho Catalogue,ESA 1997)
V= 6.83 (Kaltcheva and Georgiev, 1993)
V= 7.21, B-V= 2.07 (SIMBAD database)
HD 95687 is GSC 8958-02448 and its position is: 11h 01m 35.76s
-6102' 55.8" (2000.0)
When I first observed the star I only knew of the Tycho data and of the
"74" value plotted in the RASNZ chart (452) for AG Carinae. And I estimated it
at 6.9. Since february HD 95687 has been fading constantly (and slowly) up to
7.3 in august, so it's obvious that it's a slow variable as most of red
stars.
I ask for a Harvard designation to AAVSO HQ. I attach a chart for this new
variable and I'll send the observations in a separate report.
Best regards,
Sebastian Otero (OSE),
Buenos Aires,
Argentina.
AG, BZ, V528 Car y HD 95687.gif
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp