[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 3597] Re: V446 Her companion photometry
- Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 15:10:10 +0100 (BST)
- To: aah@nofs.navy.mil
- From: Alon Retter <ar@astro.keele.ac.uk>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 3597] Re: V446 Her companion photometry
- cc: vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- In-Reply-To: <200009071733.AA05629@runner.nofs.navy.mil>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Dear Arne and V446 Her observers,
Please note that Arne's designations for the comparison stars is
different from that in Honeycutt et al.'s paper:
Honeycutt Arne
A (nova) -
B A
C B
- C
Regards,
Alon
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Alon Retter Tel. (work) +44-(0)1782-58-3493
Physics Dept. Fax (work) +44-(0)1782-711093
Keele University -----------------------------------
Staffordshire 'As a scientist I don't believe myself, so
ST5 5BG, U.K. why should I believe you?' (A.R. 1965-2085)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000 aah@nofs.navy.mil wrote:
> Here are results from psf-fitting the triplet of
> companion stars to V446 Her. The stars are labelled
> A,B,C, where A and B are identified on the finding chart
> in Honeycutt, et al. 1998, ApJ 495, 933, and star C
> is the faint companion due west of the variable.
> The RA,DEC offsets are in arcsec, positive east and north.
>
> Star RA DEC V err B-V err V-R err R-I err
> A 1.49 -2.75 17.90 0.02 1.33 0.04 0.78 0.03 0.67 0.02
> B -2.18 -2.53 18.51 0.02 1.28 0.08 0.74 0.01 0.75 0.01
> C -2.62 -0.39 20.87 0.25 1.10 0.52 1.08 0.24 0.75 0.25
>
> These numbers are more reliable than the values in the Honeycutt
> paper since the current images had better seeing and higher
> signal/noise.
> V446 Her itself is at
> 18:57:21.61 +13:14:29.7 J2000
> again improved over the Honeycutt paper through the use of USNO-A2.0.
> Since the variable is about V=16.5 and B-V = 0.27, you must be careful
> to remove these three stars when doing photometry or you will report the
> variable as being too bright; this is especially true at the
> red wavelengths or with unfiltered photometry.
>
> Arne
>
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp