[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 2872] Re: CI Aql classification
- Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 15:44:22 +0900 (JST)
- To: vsnet-chat
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 2872] Re: CI Aql classification
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Re: [vsnet-chat 2871] CI Aql classification
> How can we interpret the behavior of CI Aql?
> Slow recurrent nova like T Pyx?
> Fast recurrent nova that reached a maximum brightness of about
> mag 6-7 in mid-April?
> X-ray nova still undetected by X-ray observatories (maybe like
> XTE J1118+480)?
> Classical nova extremely close to CI Aql? ;-)
The spectra we obtained (and others already announced in vsnet-alert)
are very similar to those of classical novae (e.g. unlike that of U Sco).
However, I wonder why this object had been dropped from the UK "Recurrent
Object Programme" -- when I saw the list in 1998, the object was definitely
in there.
Are there any prediscovery observations by ROTSE and/or TASS cameras?
Regards,
Taichi Kato
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp