Dear Prof. Skiff, >The preferred astrometric reference catalogues are Tycho-2 and >USNO-A2.0 in that order. If your CCD field is large enough to >include at least 9 or 10 Tycho-2 stars that are not much saturated, >then these should give better results than USNO-A2.0. > All this sounds fine. Be aware that if the original GSC version >1.1 positions are being used as reference for astrometry, then the >results are subject to systematic errors of sometimes over an >arcsecond (even if internal errors are small) due to the way in which >the GSC v1.1 was reduced. It is much preferable to use either GSC >v1.2 or Bill Gray's GSC-ACT. Could you give the comparison between USNO-A2.0 and GSC 1.2 or ACT as positional reference ? Sincerely Yours, Hitoshi Yamaoka, Kyushu Univ., Japan yamaoka@rc.kyushu-u.ac.jp