All: I was just given some images of Sn 2000E to post on my page. These images include several Teramo Observatory discovery images (which do not have 1999el marked), and a Marko Moilanen image which does have the SN marked. This is the first time I have announced images of new SN on these list. Please tell me if this is not appropriate Marko Moilanen writes: New images of supernovaes 2000D and 2000E are now installed on our web-pages. Quick photometry (with clear filter) of SN 2000D showed it寄 as faint as 17.1 mag, SN 2000E is about 14.1 mag and SN 1999el on the same galaxy (it寄 still visible) about 17.1mag also. It寄 very difficult to calculate these dim magnitudes because these objects are inside of galaxy寄 spiral arms but these are the results what I got. -- NAME: David W. Bishop INTERNET: dbishop@vhdl.org ( \ ) US MAIL: Hilton NY 14468-9101 A Long time ago, \__\/ PHYSICAL: 43:17:17N 77:47:37W 281' In a Galaxy far, far away... | | For Supernova info: http://vsnet.ggw.org/asras/snimages | | For VHDL/Synthesis info: http://vsnet.vhdl.org/siwg _/___\_ All standard disclaimers apply. [_______]