[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 2330] Re: GSC1.2 magnitudes near V844 Her
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 13:12:34 -0700 (PDT)
- To: aah@nofs.navy.mil, vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- From: Lew Cook <lcoo@yahoo.com>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 2330] Re: GSC1.2 magnitudes near V844 Her
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
It is worthwhile to keep in mind that V and visual
(v)magnitudes are slightly different. There are
numerous arguments about what is the proper color
correction to use for the B-V term, but if one
arbitrarily adopts a value of 0.2(B-V) color
correction factor, the magnitudes are as shown below
in a column I added in Arne's note.
Regards, Lew
http://vsnet.geocities.com/lcoo/
--- aah@nofs.navy.mil wrote:
> Hazel McGee correctly pointed out to me that my
> revised magnitude for GSC 3602-00173 almost exactly
> matches the magnitude for this star as reported
> in the GSC catalog, and therefore her estimate
> for the outburst did not have to be revised.
> I've checked additional stars in the field, with
> the following results:
Lew's added v column
> GSC mag V v=V+0.2(B-V)
> 3062-00050 14.09 14.08 14.21
> 3062-00281 12.80 12.83 13.03
> 3062-00347 13.59 13.61 13.81
> 3062-00173 12.30 12.31 12.44
> 3062-02129 13.53 13.49 13.63
> 3062-00607 12.50 12.51 12.73
>
> So, remarkably, for this specific field, GSC1.2
> magnitudes
> closely follow V-band magnitudes. This is highly
> unusual!
> Arne
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp