The Guide7 software package available from Project Pluto (pluto@gwi.net) includes the B and V magnitudes from the Tycho Catalogue (i.e. those corrected to Johnson B and V). This was done at the suggestion of Richard Miles, an amateur photometrist from the UK. Roger Pickard On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Taichi Kato wrote: > (fwd) Hipparcos/Tycho photometry > > Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 13:21:14 -0700 (MST) > From: Brian Skiff <bas@lowell.edu> > > Maciej Reszelski asked about the differences between the Hipparcos/Tycho > photometry and the standard Johnson V and B systems. There _are_ differences, > and in some instances confusion can arise as it pertains to variable-star > observing. > The Hipparcos "Hp" magnitudes result from essentially "unfiltered" data > taken with the detectors on the spacecraft. The sensitivity curve has a very > wide passband across the visible part of the spectrum, and the magnitudes > have been adjusted in an approximate way to conform to V. However, there is > a significant color term in these data, such that they should not be used for > any other than internal comparisons for the _same_star_ (i.e. not even > differentially), and color changes in, for instance, Miras will yield > additional problems. The 5th/95th percentile ranges given for the Hipparcos > stars merely represent the span of magnitudes within which 90 percent of the > measurements fall. This gives some indication of variability when combined > with knowledge of the scatter for certifiably constant stars of similar > brightness, and allows for statistical tests, etc. Even for bright stars, this > range is typically a few percent, and for stars fainter than about mag. 8, the > per-observation scatter becomes rapidly larger (the errors are about 0.4 mag. > by mag. 10!). > The Tycho part of the instrument observed in two filter passbands that > were similar to B and V, but again there is a substantial color term, and in > the published Tycho catalogues these raw "instrumental" data have been > transformed to the standard system and are shown explicitly. The "raw" data > are coded as "VT" and "BT" for the yellow- and blue-light observations---these > are the ones to avoid! The corrected magnitudes are specified as Johnson > B and V. I don't understand why the consortium bothered to show the "VT" and > "BT" magnitudes. The idea was, I gather, to preserve whatever internal > precision there is in the data, which any transformation will inevitably > reduce. This seems in my opinion to be a misplaced emphasis, since the > internal errors are already 0.1 mag. at V mag. 8.0 (i.e. lousy photometry), > and 90 percent of the Tycho stars are fainter than this. Another result has > been that those unfamiliar with photometric systems (including professional > astronomers) have confused the two sets of data, leading to all sorts of > problems. > Although many star-chart software packages have the H/T data incorporated, > I am unsure about which sets of magnitudes are used. It is easy to look up > data for individual stars using the Strasbourg 'VizieR' utility on the Web: > > http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/VizieR > > There are mirror copies in the US (which I find slower than the French one) and > in Japan. Ask for catalogue "i/239" in item 1 of the form this URL brings up. > It's best to have accurate (~0'.1) coordinates handy for this. > > \Brian > >