Several observers have noted that the U Sco measures I posted on the anon ftp site (usco.dat) are not the same as published in paper II. Our CCD had a scattered light problem during the paper II observations which I subsequently discovered and corrected. During the reprocessing that I have been doing with my old photometry, I have modified the frames that were affected by the scattered light problem to (hopefully) make them better. The major affect of the scattered light problem was to underestimate the brightness for stars located near the center of the fields. The correction can be as large as 0.06mag at V, though the colors are good since both B&V were affected in similar manners. All sequences on the anon ftp site were taken *after* the scattered light problem was fixed and so are not affected. Also, all paper I observations were with a different CCD that was unaffected by the problem. The modified results for all of the paper II CV fields will be included in an errata within paper III. If anyone needs any specific paper II field prior to the paper III publication, contact me directly rather than using the paper II published table. I apologize for not passing on this information in a more timely manner. I expected to get paper III finished much earlier than has been the case, so that researchers would have had the improved photometry. As usual, I've underestimated the effort and won't be submitting paper III until late Spring. Arne