It is first important to know that the GSC magnitudes _are_not_ V magnitudes! Those reporting V magnitudes based on the GSC are doing so in error. The blue and red magnitudes given in USNO-A1.0 are only very approximately so, completely inadequate for any real estimates of variable- star brightness. For asteroids, since they have nearly the same colors for the most part, it is permissible to observe in some non-standard passband, such as unfiltered CCD, and make only a zero-point correction transform to V or R for example. For variable stars, because of their wide range in color, one must know the colors of both the reference stars and the variable in question in order to transform one's "instrumental system" (even with a filter) to the standard one. EVen from poor climates, one can often do reasonably good calibration to the standard system simply with two stars of known magnitude and color as reference. One makes an observation by first taking a frame or two of a standard star (or small field with several of them), then taking frames of the variable, followed as soon as possible by another set of images of either the same reference stars or others nearby. Use the image-processing software you probably already have to get the brightnesses of the relevant stars on all the frames and determine the relative brightness of the variable from these observations. DO NOT use the GSC or A1.0 stars for any of this! Instead use stars from Landolt's equatorial standard list, stars in the southern E-regions, or stars selected from the very long list I keep at: http://ftp.lowell.edu/pub/bas/starcats/loneos.stds About half the stars in this list are brighter than mag. 13, and so are suitable for small telescopes with CCDs and fairly short exposure times. There are always stars within a few degrees of any target to be found in this list. \Brian