(fwd) MGC+01-04044 confusion (Rodriguez) From DRODRIG@santandersupernet.com Tue Sep 1 07:16 JST 1998 From: "Diego Rodriguez" <DRODRIG@santandersupernet.com> Subject: RE: MGC+01-04044 confusion Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1998 07:52:04 +0200 Hello Taichi. I have concluded there is some incorrect information as to the exact position of the galaxy MCG-01-04-044. Information of MGC+01-04-044 Alternate name = PGC 5072 Guide 6.0 and Real Sky >> However, an examination of the software RealSky reveals a position of approximately 1h 26m 14s, -6d 5m 44s for the galaxy. Right ascension: 01h23m18.92s Declination: +07 47' 38.4" Remarks from the PGC (Principal Galaxy Catalog):PGC 005072 Galactic longitude: 136.525 Galactic latitude: -54.234 Supergalactic longitude: 306.229 Supergalactic latitude: -4.632 Total B magnitude: 15.040 .410 Heliocentric galaxy RV from neutral hydrogen: 2700.000 9.676 km/s Galaxy RV relative to the Local Group: 2882.851 km/second Galaxy RV relative to the GSR: 2783.800 km/second Galaxy RV corrected for Virgo infall: 2726.574 km/second Galaxy RV relative to the 3K background: 2392.303 km/sec Major axis: 0.656.192 arcminutes Alternate names: MCG 1- 4- 44 CGCG 411- 42 VV 730 Comments from the MCG (Morphological Catalog of Galaxies): Total magnitude: 15.2 Magnitude is accurate to 1 mag Surface brightness (1=brightest, 6=dimmest): 1 Major axis, outer part: 0.60 arcminutes Minor axis, outer part: 0.40 arcminutes Surface brightness, 1st outer region (1=brightest, 6=dimmest): 3 Right ascension: 01h23m18.s Declination: +07 47' 38" Magnitude: 15.2 Surface brightness, inner part (1=very bright, 6=barely visible): 1 Surface brightness, 1st outer region (1=very bright, 6=barely visible): 3 Diego Rodriguez drodrig@globalmail.net M1 Group Madrid Spain >Re: [vsnet 1575] Re: (fwd) On SN1998dm (Howerton) - by Larry > >> I viewed MCG+01-04-044 at approximately 9:30 UT (4:30 a.m. CDT) August 30, >> 1998 with a 13.1" (33.3cm) f/4.5 dobsonian at 202x. After making a visual >> examination of the field, I have concluded there is some incorrect >> information as to the exact position of the galaxy MCG-01-04-044. >> >> The chart provided at the address listed below incorrectly positions the >> galaxy. Furthermore, my software (Guide 6.0) also plots the galaxy at the >> same position (1h 26.319m, -6d 4.433m). Both show a star (GSC 4684 1696 per >> Guide 6.0) in the south-southwestern tip of the galaxy when this star >> actually lies some 1/2' following the northeastern tip of the galaxy. >> However, an examination of the software RealSky reveals a position of >> approximately 1h 26m 14s, -6d 5m 44s for the galaxy. >> >> Others may make the same mistake I did this morning in believing there is a >> foreground star in the SSW tip and be frustrated in not being able to detect >> the supernova when, in fact, this star is probably the supernova. >> >> Thus if I am correct, the only star visible in the SSW tip of MCG+01-04-044 >> is SN1998dm. Since I mistook it for a foreground star I did not make an >> estimate of its brightness. However, I had made a mental note that it was >> about 14.0 to 14.5 as I was wondering why this "foreground" star was much >> fainter than expected. >> >> Am I correct in my conclusion? > > Your finding is correct; most star chart plotting program seem to use >the original MCG coordinates. > > Original MCG coordinates (precessed to J2000.0) and RC3 ones: > >012618.0 -060359 (2000.0) RC3_A0123-06 PGC5341 .SB.5*. >012619.0 -060426 (2000.0) CfA_A0123-0620 v=1968km/s Bmag=13.1 >012619.1 -060425 (2000.0) M-01-04-044 > > GSC and USNO entries for this galaxy (detected in IRAS also): > >GSC4684.2075 012614.03 -060555.4 (2000.0) 11.11 0 N >GSC4684.1578 012614.46 -060538.0 (2000.0) 10.48 0 N >USNO0825.00327490 012614.037 -060555.43 (2000.0) 11.1 99.9 >USNO0825.00327515 012614.466 -060538.01 (2000.0) 10.5 99.9 >USNO0825.00327522 012614.546 -060536.88 (2000.0) 9.3 9.7 >012613.8 -060543 (2000.0) IRAS01237-0621 0.475L 0.296L 0.725 2.171 -1% >012613.8 -060543 (2000.0) SSC01237-0621 0.475L 0.296L 0.725 2.171 >012614.8 -060537 (2000.0) FSC01237-0621 0.130L 0.145L 0.683 2.001 > > Regarding the supernova itself, the reported position seems to be a few >arcsec off, as I posted earlier -- could someone confirm this astrometry? > > There is a 15.5 mag star west to the SN. So observers are requested >to avoid confusion and/or contamination of this foreground star. > > GIF image kindly provided by S. Massaro is at > > http://ftp.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/vsnet/SNe/sn1998dm/sn1998dm.gif > >Regards, >Taichi Kato >