[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 405] Re:
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 10:52:05 +0100 (BST)
- To: Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- From: Erik Kuulkers <e.kuulkers1@physics.oxford.ac.uk>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 405] Re:
- cc: vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp, e.kuulkers1@physics.oxford.ac.uk
- In-Reply-To: <199706240046.JAA10651@ceres.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
On Tue, 24 Jun 1997, Taichi Kato wrote:
> > What exactly is a "low quiescence"? Is this different from "normal"
> > quiescence?
>
> I should have used "extended quiescence". We have no outbursts for
> a month. However, the present quiescence seems to be a bit fainter than
> normal ones, as reported by several observers at or fainter than mag 15.
The next outburst of SU UMa might then be an interesting one! It might
have a larger amplitude and a longer duration. Do you know if SU UMa has
had such "extended quiescence" episodes before?
Regards,
Erik Kuulkers
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
VSNET Home Page