[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 193] V versus v Re to vsnet-chat 181
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 1997 02:10:53 +0100
- To: vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- From: Roland.Boninsegna@gate71.be (Roland Boninsegna)
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 193] V versus v Re to vsnet-chat 181
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Stan Walker wrote:
>The point I am making at some length is that in the areas where visual
measures are most valuable - measuring the long-term behaviour of the
large magnitude variations in stars the discrepancies between v and V
don't matter. Any variations between the two systems are submerged in the
noise of the visual measures or can be scaled out when comparing light
curves.
>The discrepancies between v and V don't matter even for visual estimates of
short
period variable stars. A determination of the time of a minimum, made on an
eclipsing star, from visual estimates, will be as valuable as a
photoelectric one
(especially if no photoelectric measures has been done!). The choice of correct
comparison stars is the most important. The Hipparcos and Tycho catalogues will
help a lot.
Regards Roland BONINSEGNA
Roland Boninsegna Asteroidal Occultations (EAON)
Rue de Mariembourg, 35 Observations of Suspected Variable Stars (GEOS)
B 5670 Dourbes Astronomy teaching (EAAE)
Tel: + 32 60 399925 E-mail: roland.boninsegna@gate71.be
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp