[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

[vsnet-campaign-dn 3677] OU Vir: post-superoutburst fading stage



OU Vir: post-superoutburst fading stage

Dear Colleagues,

   Tom Krajci reported another set of excellent post-superoutburst data
(May 21).  The Kyoto team also succeeded in obtaining a full set of data.
The object still stays well above the quiescent level, indicating that
the object is experiencing the post-superoutburst slow fading stage,
which is sometimes most conspicuously seen in low mass-transfer dwarf
novae.  The meain fading rate is 0.1 mag/d, which is comparable to
that of the plateau stage.  The most striking example of such a
continuing slow fade was seen in WX Cet in 1998 (Kato et al. 2001,
PASJ 53, 893), in which the phenomenon was described as:

   "WX Cet showed a slow fading after the superoutburst.  This phenomenon
may be an exemplification of a gradual decay of the disk viscosity, which
determines the luminosity of the disk.  Following Osaki et al. (2001),
we suspect that the ignition of thermal instability accidentally failed
to occur under competition with the decay of viscosity in the present
post-superoutburst state of WX Cet.  The post-superoutburst decline of
WX Cet was almost perfectly linear (exponential), with a rate of
0.10 mag/d.  Interestingly, this rate of decline is almost perfectly
identical with the mean rate of decline (0.10 mag/d) during the plateau
stage.  Although this coincidence may be merely accidental, this may
suggest the existence of a time scale for the decay of the disk viscosity
related to the decay of the superoutburst plateau."

   This phenomenon, if it reflects the slow decay of the viscosity,
may suggest a near-future (within a few days) rebrightening.  If it
doesn't occur, there may be a failure of outburst ignition, as observed
in WX Cet in 1998.

   Up to now, the post-superoutburst variation in OU Vir is well
represented by a combination of two periods: 0.0727 d and 0.0746 d.
The former period corresponds to the orbital period (agrees within
estimation errors).  The latter period may be related to late superhumps,
although the perliminarily measured period is slightly longer than
the superhump period.  We absolutely need more data (as complete as
possible) to exactly follow the period structure and evolution, not to
mention eclipses.

   The OU Vir observations have been extremely productive, and we
expect upcoming excellent runs during these dark nights!

Regards,
Taichi Kato
VSNET Collaboration team


Return to Home Page

Return to the Daisaku

vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Powered by ooruri technology