Stan Walker wrote: > Hi Taichi, > > I sent you some data on AB Normae at your request in 2000. This clearly > showed superhumps with a similar period to that detected this year. Did you > ever do anything with these? Your AB Nor finding in 2000 was already sent out as vsnet-alert 4589, 4590 and vsnet-gcvs 34. People would have been fairly confident about the SU UMa-type nature of this object, but we apparently needed further confirmation and period determination. Also, in order to make things more clearly, the "data" you sent were a figure plot, not individual measurements. A proper assessment of the "data" should naturally be done on original measurements rather than a figure plot. We have been always requiring original measurements to be duly incorporated into a final scienetific analysis. Regards, Taichi Kato VSNET Collaboration team