Dear colleagues, I had another clear observing night on April 07/08, 2002, during which I could successfully follow V589 Her (unfiltered CCD photometry at CBA Belgium Observatory). The object again had faded compared to the previous night (average unfiltered mag : 15.6C), and I had to use substantially longer exposure times to generate sufficient 'counts'. The resulting light curve (see www.lunarpages.com/cbabelgium) still shows the existense of 3 superhumps, although less qualified than on the previous two nights. When combining this data set with my ohter available V589 Her data (a total of 562 observations), I obtain a superhump period of 0.0864 +/- 0.0005 d, using the PDM technique. Important to note is that the period diagram also shows a second possible period (of identical strength) at 0.0950 +/- 0.0005 d. This would turn V589 Her into a long-period UGSU dwarf nova (inside period gap). I'm expecting some further data sets from other CBA stations, and that definitely will help to differentiate amongst both periods. Sky conditions were very favourable also on Apr 08/09, but the object had faded too much for my equipment to conduct time series photometry. It was at about (unfiltered) mag 16.2 on 2002, Apr 08.93 UT. Kind regards, Tonny Vanmunster CBA Belgium Observatory www.lunarpages.com/cbabelgium