Please note that I made another positive observation of RX J0558.3+6753 in february: RXJ0558 020214.893 <14.6 DPV 14.6 RXJ0558 020215.854 <14.6 DPV 14.6 RXJ0558 020216.801 13.9 DPV 13.37-3V1-14.04 RXJ0558 020216.863 13.9 DPV 13.37-5V2-14.04 Clear skies! -------------------------------------------- Pavol A. Dubovsky Podbiel, SLOVAKIA > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp > [mailto:owner-vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp]On Behalf Of > Taichi Kato > Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 4:00 AM > To: vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp; > vsnet-campaign-dn@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp; > vsnet-outburst@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp > Cc: vsnet-gcvs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp > Subject: [vsnet-alert 7260] RX J0558.3+6753 outburst > > > RX J0558.3+6753 outburst > > According to Pavol A. Dubovsky (vsnet-obs 39223), the ROSAT-selected > catclysmic variable RX J0558.3+6753 is undergoing a bright outburst > (mv=13.9 on Mar. 31.839 UT). > > 055818.0 +675345 (2000.0) RXJ0558.3+6753 17.0B CV > 055818.7 +675321 (2000.0) 1RXS-F_J055818.8+675322 0.048 0.89 0.68 > > The last outburst occurred in 2001 April, at mv=14.0 (T. Kinnunen). > The 2001 outburst apparently quickly faded (observed by the Nyrola team). > Quick follow-up observations are strongly encouraged. > > Please also note that there is another "RX J0558" (V405 Aur). Please > avoid any confusions caused by abbreviations, > > Regards, > Taichi Kato > VSNET Collaboration team