[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-alert 4853] RE: [vsnet-campaign 67] New variable in a field of RXJ...?
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 20:53:59 -0000
- To: "Rudolf Novak" <rudolfn@physics.muni.cz>, "VSNET Alert" <vsnet-alert@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>, "vsnet-campaign" <vsnet-campaign@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- From: "Tonny Vanmunster" <Tonny.Vanmunster@advalvas.be>
- Subject: [vsnet-alert 4853] RE: [vsnet-campaign 67] New variable in a field of RXJ...?
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <39209B7B.6952600B@physics.muni.cz>
- Reply-To: <Tonny.Vanmunster@advalvas.be>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-alert@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Dear Rudolf,
I have analysed my RXJ1450.5+6403 CCD images for the object you indicate, but can not confirm your findings. I see no traces of variability in GSC 4176 384, to a granularity of about 0.03 mag.
Best regards,
Tonny Vanmunster
CBA Belgium Observatory
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-vsnet-campaign@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
> [mailto:owner-vsnet-campaign@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp]On Behalf Of Rudolf
> Novak
> Sent: maandag 15 mei 2000 23:51
> To: VSNET Alert; Tonny Vanmunster; vsnet-campaign
> Subject: [vsnet-campaign 67] New variable in a field of RXJ...?
>
>
> Dear Tonny and all,
>
> I feel little stupid to report discovery of a new variable each day but
> I'd like to ask you to check the star
> GSC=0417600384
> in a field of RXJ1450.5+64.... From my current run the star seems to
> hump like the superhumper lower but with much more longer period (for
> first look it seems aprox. 4x longer). I'll try to analyze it and send
> to VSNET at morning.
>
> Regards
>
> Rudolf
>
> P.S. Some delta scuti?
>
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp