> > > THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF VARIABLE STAR OBSERVERS > 25 Birch Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA > Tel. 617-354-0484 Fax 617-354-0665 > http://vsnet.aavso.org > > * * * AAVSO NEWS FLASH * * * > >Subject: 0640-16 HL CMA 0846+58 BZ UMA No. 405 > 0741-12 UY PUP 0854-24 VZ PYX March 10, 1999 > >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >... > >0846+58 BZ URSAE MAJORIS > >The outburst of BZ UMa that was reported in News Flash No. 404 appears to >be a superoutburst, as indicated by the following observations: > > AAVSO Observer AAVSO Observer > UT Mag. Initials UT Mag. Initials > >MAR 06.1465 15.9: HSG MAR 09.788 10.4 MUY >MAR 07.1326 <15.7 HSG MAR 10.1042 10.8: HSG >MAR 08.944 14.1 OJR MAR 10.1410 10.8: HSG > >We encourage observers to monitor this star and report their observations to >the AAVSO, with timings carried to 4 decimal places. It is recommended to >observe this reported superoutburst of BZ UMa every 5 minutes for at least 3 >to 4 hours in search of superhumps. According to the AAVSO International >Database, the last recorded superoutburt of BZ UMa was on April 7, 1998 when >the star reached magnitude 10.9 at maximum. That's complete nonsense. The 1998 April outburst was clearly a short one. And the latest estimates by Gary Poyner and myself seem to indicate that BZ UMa is currently about 1.5 magnitudes fainter than 1.0 days ago. A bright outburst of a (suspected) SU UMa-type dwarf nova doesn't necessarily mean a supermaximum. The only distinction between normal outbursts and superoutbursts is their duration. If a SU UMa-type dwarf nova is near maximum for the third consecutive night then you can (rather) safely assume that it's a supermaximum. Regards, Patrick