BC UMa estimations

Dear dr.Kato,
last night we made some additional estimations on BC UMa. According our estima-
tion the variable is fainther compared to our previous observation (03/05/94),
but not so fainther as others report in your circulars. I don't know if there
is some big difference between the sequence we used (TA) and other sequences,
and anyway we are sure about the fact that we are really observing BC UMa!!!
 The maps we use (PASP & TA) cleary indicate the variable and its comparisons.

 I send you our latest estimations; I leave you the decision if publish or not
our data.

  Giovanni Sostero    L5V5M (TA Sequence)  ==> V=13.2  05.878/05/1994
  Antonio Lepardo     L5V5M (TA Sequence)  ==> V=13.2  05.880/-5/1994

 The instrument used was a Newtonian reflector D=0.45m at 200X

 Best regards,
              -Giovanni Sostero-